Google
 

New software ("Read it ")














Girlfriend 5.0 to W i fe 1.0 :)

Dear Tech Support Team:


Last year I upgraded from Girlfriend 5.0 to Wife 1.0.
I soon noticed that the new program, Wife 1.0 installed itself into all other programs and now monitors all other system activities.
Applications such as BachelorNights 10.3, Cricket 5.0, BeerWithBuddies 7.5, and Outings 3.6 no longer runs, crashing the system whenever selected. I can't seem to keep Wife 1.0 in the background while attempting to run my favorite applications.

I'm thinking about going back to Girlfriend 5.0 , but the 'uninstall' doesn't work on Wife 1.0.

Please help!

Thanks,
"A Troubled User"



REPLY:


Dear Troubled User:


This is a very common problem that people complain about.
Many people upgrade from Girlfriend 5.0 to Wife 1.0 , thinking that it is just a Utilities and Entertainment program.
Wife 1.0 is an OPERATING SYSTEM and is designed by its Creator to run EVERYTHING!! !
It is also impossible to delete Wife 1.0 and to return to Girlfriend 5.0.
It is impossible to uninstall, or purge the program files from the system once installed.
You cannot go back to Girlfriend 5.0 because Wife 1.0 is designed not to allow this.
I recommend that you keep Wife1.0 and work on improving the environment.
I suggest installing the background application "Yes Dear" to alleviate software augmentation.
The best course of action is to enter the command C:\APOLOGIZE because ultimately you will have to give the APOLOGIZE command before
the system will return to normal anyway.
Wife 1.0 is a great program, but it tends to be very high maintenance. Wife 1.0 comes with several support programs, such as Clean 2.5, Sweep 3.0, Cook 1.5 and DoLaundry 4.2. However, be very careful how you use these programs. Improper use will cause the system to launch the program NagNag 9.5 . Once this happens, the only way to improve the performance of Wife 1.0 is to purchase additional software. I recommend Sarees 2.1 and Jewellery 5.0



STATUTORY WARNING
: DO NOT, under any circumstances, install SecretaryWithShortS kirt 3.3. This application is not supported by Wife 1.0 and will cause irreversible damage to the operating system.



Best of luck,
Tech Support ...












Decision Making(must read)

A group of children were playing near two railway tracks, one still in use while the other disused. Only one child played on the disused track, the rest on the operational track. The train is coming, and you are just beside the track interchange. You can make the train change its course to the disused track and save most of the kids. However, that would also mean the lone child playing by the disused track would be sacrificed. Or would you rather let the train go its way? Let's take a pause to think what kind of decision we could make................ .
.
.
.
.
.
.Most people might choose to divert the course of the train, and sacrifice only one child. You might think the same way, I guess , because to save most of the children at the expense of only one child was rational decision most people would make, morally and emotionally. But, have you ever thought that the child choosing to play on the disused track had in fact made the right decision to play at a safe place? Nevertheless, he had to be sacrificed because of his ignorant friends who chose to play where the danger was.

This kind of dilemma happens around us everyday. In the office, community, in politics and especially in a democratic society, the minority is often sacrificed for the interest of the majority, no matter how foolish or ignorant the majority are, and how farsighted and knowledgeable the minority are. The child who chose not to play with the rest on the operational track was sidelined. And in the case he was sacrificed, no one would shed a tear for him. The great critic Leo Velski Julian who told the story said he would not try to change the course of the train because he believed that the kids playing on the operational track should have known very well that track was still in use, and that they should have run away if they heard the train's sirens. If the train was diverted, that lone child would definitely die because he never thought the train could come over to that track!

Moreover, that track was not in use probably because it was not safe. If the train was diverted to the track, we could put the lives of all passengers on board at stake! And in your attempt to save a few kids by sacrificing one child, you might end up sacrificing hundreds of people to save these few kids. While we are all aware that life is full of tough decisions that need to be made, we may not realize that hasty decisions may not always be the right one. "What's right isn't always popular... and what's popular isn't always right."

Everybody makes mistakes; that's why they put erasers on pencils.




"Intellectuals solve problems; geniuses prevent them."

-- Einstein

Excellent Story


Lateral thinking !!!!

















SOLVE this

























Many years ago in a
small Indian village,





A
farmer had the misfortune 0f owing a large sum of money to a
village moneylender






The
Moneylender, who was old and ugly, fancied the farmer's
beautiful daughter. So he proposed a bargain






He
said he would forgo the farmer's debt if he could marry his daughter.
Both the farmer and his daughter were horrified by the proposal






So
the cunning money-lender suggested that they let Providence decide the matter






He
told them that he would put a black pebble and a white pebble into an
empty money bag. Then the girl would have to pick one pebble from
the bag






1) If
she picked the black pebble, she would become his wife and her father's debt
would be forgiven






2)
If she picked the white pebble she need not marry him and her father's
debt would still be forgiven






3) But
if she refused to pick a pebble, her father would be
thrown into jail






They
were standing on a pebble strewn path in the farmer's field.
As they talked, the moneylender bent over to pick up two pebbles.
As he picked them up, the sharp-eyed girl noticed that he had
picked up two black pebbles and put them into the bag.






He
then asked the girl to pick a pebble from the bag.






Now,
imagine that you were standing in the field. What would you
have done if you were the girl? If you had to advise her, what
would you have told her?






Careful
analysis would produce three possibilities:






1. The
girl should refuse to take a pebble






2.
The girl should show that there were two black pebbles in the bag And expose
the money-lender as a cheat.






3.
The girl should pick a black pebble and sacrifice herself in order To save
her father from his debt and imprisonment.






Take
a moment to ponder over the story. The above story is used to
make us appreciate the difference between
lateral and logical thinking






What
would you recommend to the girl to do?






Well,
here is what she did ....




It
is only that we don't attempt to think.